30.3.26

the inmate's journal : the academy v


Quests, being quests, don’t particularly care about reason, other than any reason required to pursue the quest.  So the cowboy’s reasons look like madness to the eco-vegan, the poet’s to the lawyer, the academic’s to the evangelical, the politician’s to the bum.  Each has a different reason and a useful definition of God might be that he’s the sum of all reasons.  A little spiritual mathematics for those with some spare time. 

 

There are trivial quests of course.  Quests to find that special dental floss.  To never miss a Seinfeld episode.  To always keep the SUV clean and dentless.  They’re fine.  Let the dental floss seekers be satisfied.  Let the Seinfeld addicts be fulfilled.  But trivial quests are possible.  True, someone might scrape your Infiniti QX56, but it’s more likely someone won’t.  If you make that special call to that special floss manufacturer and pay that special price, you’re probably going to get that special floss.  All good.  Something to talk to your friends about.  But the quests I like are the impossible ones, the ones the night talks to you about—spreading chivalry in an unchivalrous world, building a garden to the moon, painting God.  And the seekers I like are those who see dreams as if they were trees and trees as if they were dreams.

 

I don’t know if the Devil’s advice was any good.  Dalwhinnie and the boys rejected me for the Ph.D., but Knickerloo accepted me, on condition that I get a Ph.D.  The Devil laughed I guess, and I moved into the academy to continue my increasingly blurry quest, into a 6x10’ teeny-windowed fustydusty office in which I was expected to expand the boundaries of human knowledge.

 

Knickerloo wasn’t a tier one university … not one of those envy-league extravaganzas obsessed with its own endowment of vanity.  It wasn’t even tier two, with dreams of becoming tier one.  It was tier seven, with dreams of becoming tier six.  It dreamt of dreaming of vanity; it tried it on in the closet and was desperately impressed.  My colleagues had Ph.D.s, it’s true, but they were from the University of Cowdip, Ostralasia U. Online (OUO), Krung Thep Brothel and College, and the Newest School of Deconstructionism at Southwest Yonkers.  Knickerloo had recently implemented graduate degrees, it’s true, but they were in things like Curtain Management, Leonard H. McCoy Studies, and The New Idahoan Politic.  Tens of thousands of students attended its classes, it’s true, but only three of them could spell knowledgeable and only two could write a twenty-word sentence with fewer than four grammatical mistakes.

 

But there was something in Knickerloo’s dispossessed nature—its perfect injection of democracy into education so that even video-addict crackheads could get a degree—that appealed to my cultural voyeurism and infatuation with madness.  Plus, I tried to reason enthusiastically—there’s something about tier seven universities that’s structurally more honest than tier ones.  That reflects our cultural mediocrity, interests, ambitions, and hypocrisy more fully than those that are primarily dens of the wealthy.  That says, We are the weird secularization of Christianity, where all are welcome into the Kingdom … even the weak, lobotomized and leprous … especially the weak, lobotomized and leprous.  Yes, at Knickerloo I was returning to my religious roots, but Christ was called curriculum and salvation tenure and the underprivileged were exalted and the exalted were envied.  

 

The first few years of my professoriate were spent doing four things:

 

1.     Doing what I was getting paid to do—teaching and committee work.

2.     Doing what I wasn’t getting paid to do— covert research on whether I could find God or dreams or madness or satisfaction or whatever-I-was-looking-for in the university.

3.     Not doing what I was getting paid to do—getting a Ph.D., doing statistical analysis on things like middle management Friday afternoon email misuse in Fortune 100 companies cross-tabbed to household charitable donations during global famine relief media campaigns.

4.     Managing perceptions so that everyone focused on the first thing and ignored the other things.

 

I enjoyed doing what I wasn’t getting paid to do the most, followed by not doing what I was getting paid to do.  After that it was a tossup.  But, hey, institutional Robin Hoods, sucking salaries from bureaucracies to feed their dream-cravings, are a rare commodity these days.  We need more of them.  Support groups, workshops, tax credits.

 

The political scene at Knickerloo, though, was considerably different than the religious and business scenes I had survived.  In the church, the hierarchy’s something like this—

 

In business, the hierarchy looks like—


But in the academy, the hierarchy’s squashed into shapes hierarchies were never meant to be in—

 


Throw into the oval mix illusions of knowledge and hipness, denial of madness, government policy, boards and books and the memory of books, the ascendancy of accounting, student rights, the cabal of tenure, political correctness, and the utter destitution of anyone anywhere with management experience—and that explains what I’m getting at:  it was easy for everyone to ignore what I was and wasn’t doing; they were all too busy trying not to suffocate under the knowledge factory’s ghoulish demands.

 

I felt wonder for my colleagues.  How did they do it?  What made them believe so fervently?  These hyper-educated phenomena who worked nine days a week teaching classes, supervising graduate students, seducing graduate students, staying current on every word of every scholar who had ever said anything remotely related to anything they were supposed to know anything about, writing grant applications, monitoring each affair that might affect their grant applications, transferring all their courses to the online world, responding to the thousand student emails they received each minute, dressing as if fashion had never been invented, attending conferences in Barcelona, Sao Paulo, Cairo, Beijing, publishing one book and ten articles annually, chairing committees, sitting on committees, negotiating to avoid committees … when did they have time to think?


28.3.26

the inmate's journal : the academy iv


Ph.D., said Dr. Dalwhinnie as he sat at the head of the Kilchoman Entrance Committee, The Committee is firstly and preeminently curious as to why you’re an appropriate candidate for a Ph.D.  You seem oriented to the world of business.  You seem unfocused.  You seem … odd.  You must also know that we have extensive competition for only a few spots.  Many of the applicants have a great deal of money.

 

I have connections in the government.  That could get me grants.

 

Yes, yes.  Grants.  Determining everything these days.  Well.  Dr. Dalwhinnie paused and cleaned the wax out of his ears, piling it in orderly heaps and arranging them with absorbed interest.  What do you want to do your Ph.D. in? 

 

I was thinking of trying to figure out why people still take the Ph.D. seriously … sort of like, what the Ph.D. is because I don’t think anybody really knows.

 

Dr. Bladnoch, said Dr. Dalwhinnie.

 

Dr. Glengyle, said Dr. Bladnoch.

 

Dr. Dalwhinnie, said Dr. Glengyle.

 

I mean, I’ve discovered no correlation whatsoever between the number of degrees a person has and his or her ability to have insight into anything.  It’s not that I think academics are necessarily stupider than, say, ferry boat operators or taxidermists or professional kidnappers or potheads, but that I’ve seen no evidence they’re any smarter either.  It seems to me, then, that a Ph.D. isn’t about knowledge or intelligence or anything like that, but something else.  I’d like to do my Ph.D. in what that something else is.

 

Have you considered something in the semiotics line? said Dr. Dalwhinnie.

 

Something like the semiotics of post-colonial rhetoric, said Dr. Bladnoch.

 

Or the rhetoric of post-colonial semiotics, said Dr. Speyburn.

 

Or even the rhetoric of post-rhetoric rhetoric, said Dr. Glengyle.

 

Very exciting, very exciting, said Dr. Dalwhinnie.

 

They’re the rage, said Dr. Scapa.

 

We could get you a Ph.D. if you did one of those, said Dr. Aberfeldy.

 

But if everyone’s doing that, wouldn’t it be good if I did something else?

 

Like what?

 

Like wondering what the Ph.D. is.

 

Mr. Peer.  I’m not sure you understand the Ph.D.  A Ph.D. requires the host faculty to have expertise in the student’s area of investigation.  At Kilchoman U., we have no faculty who have specialty in your area of interest.

 

What exactly would I study if I did a Ph.D. in your areas of expertise?

 

You would read our texts.

 

And listen to us talk.

 

And analyze our words.

 

And pay us. 

 

And pay us.

 

And write papers about us.

 

And talk about us.

 

And say how brilliant we are.

 

Then when you graduate, you’d write about how much you hate us.

 

That’s the academic way, said Dr. Dalwhinnie.

 

That’s the academic way, said Dr. Glengyle.

 

That’s the academic way, said Dr. Scapa.

 

And the doctors, horribly dressed and juggling mothballs, drank a lot more than a little and put on their gowns and moved in solemn procession, chanting—

 

We don’t like to talk, we like to semiotic;

never mind society when there’s pomposity;

the more obscure, the more de rigeur …

that’s the academic way!

 

The Ph.D. may be made of cheese (and not the best kind),

but who cares when you need cheese to get a job?

We’ll teach you to go to the Lacan and wipe your Derrida …

it’s a hackademic, always, a quackademic day!

 

We’re full of leftwing words but live in rightwing burbs

and fill the gap with our reputations and our bodkins

which we use for the good ol’ professorial out-in:

it’s office hour! pour it neat! unzip the flannel! share the knowledge!—

don’t be dolts or dummkopfs!—kneel and … sackademic clackademic clapidemic … pray!


So screw you bums who can’t spell simulacrum—

we can spell and smell it, we’re the sphincter and the pulpit

of pomo-ohmo-whippsygobbly-pomo-ohno-existence don’t exist;

we got genitals for cufflinks, eternal sinecure,

we got brain flognarde and brine ideas and Flydegger soufflé …

it’s the … crackademic wackydemic slackydemic way!

26.3.26

the inmate's journal : the academy iii


Dr. Hite 

 

To decide whether or not I should apply to Knickerloo, I decided to consult the Devil.  After all, Jesus, with his turn-the-other-cheek and if-you-even-lust-in-your-heart-you’re-fucked could only be regression and suicide … but the Devil, offering plump fruit and the fresh sting of nudity—surely he was the true son of God.  He was the one who had inherited the earth after God died, the true provost of dreams.  I found him in his office in the basement of the American consulate in Oaxaca City.

 

What can I do for you today? the Devil asked.

 

I understand you’re in charge of dreams, madness, and knowledge.

 

I was in my prime, but a troupe of French poets wrested them away from me in the nineteenth century.

 

But you still know something about them, don’t you?

 

I know there’s not much difference between them.  The Devil paused to pour himself a coffee and quietly weep.  Or there wasn’t.  Now dreams and madness are subdivisions of psychotherapy and knowledge belongs to anyone with Internet access … I don’t know how your species expects to evolve with that kind of setup.

 

I think it has something to do with democracy.

 

That’s what I hear.

 

You’re not involved these days?

 

Lately I’ve been sitting around advising the poor how to get into the U.S.

 

Isn’t that Jesus’ domain?

 

Jude, your theological training’s out-of-date; the divisions have blurred; for the last century or so I’ve had to take whatever work I can get.

 

I didn’t realize things were that bad.

 

Oh they’re worse; yesterday I had to fill in for Jesus on one of his Starbucks shifts.  Anyway, I’m sure you’re not here to discuss me.  Do you need American citizenship?  My usual price is a bottle of Booker’s bourbon and ten Montecristo No. 4s.

 

I actually just need your advice on whether to apply for a university faculty post.

 

Do you have a Ph.D.?

 

No, but I have an undergrad and two graduate degrees.  I also have a great deal of experience.

 

Doesn’t matter.  I applied to Cornell with four undergrads, five Master’s, and twenty-five centuries of experience.  They told me I should try Microsoft.

 

That’s depressing.

 

It was good advice.  Microsoft’s in charge of knowledge these days.  I spent two years there working on the Xbox 360 interface.  Happiest days of my life.

 

I don’t know what to do Satan.  I’m on this quest to find where dreams and madness have gone since God died.  I’ve looked in religion and business but I just don’t think I’ve found them yet.

 

Have you tried cocaine?

 

You’re not much help.

 

And you thought you might find them in the university?

 

I’ve had it, I’ve looked almost everywhere.

 

Well, I still am owed a few favors.  Fine.  Give Dr. Dalwhinnie at Kilchoman U. a call, tell him we talked.

 

Thanks Satan, I really appreciate it.  Do I have to give you my soul or anything?

 

No, no, I don’t believe in that stuff anymore.  But give Dalwhinnie a hug for me.  Oh, and tell him the Yankees would have lost in ’64 even if he hadn’t run over his wife.

24.3.26

the inmate's journal : the academy ii


I had had one objective at New Bank—to sit at the feet of its great gold-wielding god and hear business’ glittering truth tinkle from that gilded throne.  There … the truth tinkled and I let you eavesdrop and the truth, as it often is, was a choice.  Dreams and madness … or money?  Dreams and madness, thanks.  And where on God’s unholy earth are dreams and madness most concentrated?  Not the asylum … no, asylums are for those who refuse the world’s insanities and go nuts because of it.  No, I reasoned at the time, the zenith of dreams and madness must be the academy … all those obsessive eccentrics taking pictures of black holes, detailing every historical offense, counting the number of prepositions in Macbeth.  So, naturally, thinking of myself as being weird, I thought I might fit in there.  The mad all get along with each other, don’t they?  Don’t they?

 

I didn’t say no to Hal because he was wrong, but because he was boring.  He offered me more money, more power; the promise of sanity and respectability.  He dangles keys to the dictionary, a Lexus LS, and elevator lust.  Acid love will wet my dark and omnipotent head and I’ll be driven to the mausoleum on rubber accolades.  Hey, children of VISA, parents of headlines, this is it … dreams in a skyscraper, numbers on my forehead, security in a tomb … death calling sweetly from bank accounts and mortgages.  Living behind elevator mirrors, reaching out to stroke your thighs.  To resist its leather chair is the task of the inmate.  Yes, we all are inmates, but there’s only worthy jailor; I call her Life.

 

Whether the university is life or not is another question.  As a student, stumbling through three degrees on the liquid trinity of beer, coffee and lust, I didn’t know what it was.  When philosophy tells you everything’s meaningless and disability studies tells you everything’s meaningful and business tells you it’s all about money and community services tells you it’s all about care and history tells you it’s all about narrative and art history tells you it’s all about freaks and psychology tells you it’s all about projection … and projection and money they sound pretty good and you leave with lots of illusions and maybe a job and some weird sexual experiences that you could have got without paying a hundred grand and a mind bent on turning itself off as quickly as possible and debts piled to Ganymede and no ability to think clearly about anything and maybe a job and free eyeware every two years and that’s what it’s all about vision, a job a job …

 

Education is the most powerful weapon you can use to change the world … Your professor … he must know what he’s talking about … why else would he have all those degrees and be able to say incomprehensible things?

 

I remember the eminent Dr. Hermin Nodrass, who didn’t teach me Shakespeare in ENG911.  He was tall, lean, wore every day the same ash pants, bleak white shirt, tartan tie and weary tweed jacket, had mold growing from his ears, and spoke in whippet.  He’d lean, boneless, over the lectern, tie twisted in 13 directions, the most active part of him his right forefinger as it eagerly probed his nostrils.

 

I don’t want to but I remember the esteemed Dr. Melsa V. Bloon-Sark, Herbert Hosprey Professor of Historical Ballistics, who didn’t teach me about early medieval siege technologies in graduate school.  She wore sweaters so thick they devoured her breasts while she devoured a 200-tissue box of 3-plies before break, and when I went to see her about a research problem she spent the entire time sifting through a massive jar of rusty paperclips, finding nothing, mumbling, Yes, yes, read er Fuffingeist, Fuffingeist, er yes yes, read, that’s it, Fuffinyes, Herr geist, Fuffinfuff.

 

But there were also moments when the skies opened and light rained from heaven.  When the world in all its bloody unintelligibility scabbed into meaning.  When ideas choreographed by Shiva danced across the classroom.  When Museum Studies, French, Industrial Engineering, Social Psychology, and Theology talked across the night and from their talk produced a song.  When that distant being called a professor said I don’t know, and knowledge was born.

 

Who knows how these moments come about?  You can’t predict them.  You can’t produce them.  They aren’t waiting in your pocket like a credit card.  Maybe you can facilitate them, but unless something (I don’t know what it’s called) comes from somewhere (I don’t know its location), the light is going to stay hidden and knowledge is simply another word.

 

But when knowledge is new, when it’s living and laughing in your face, it’s not a word but vision and power.  The toddler climbs the bookcase and throws all the books on the floor … ecstasy!  The secret grade two girls’ club invents a language and passes notes written in Schnizzerfleik during math class … delight!  The student reads Hamlet and sees for the first time the irreconcilable tension between the individual and society … horror!  The poet stumbles down a filthy alley and finds the phrase he’s been seeking for months … awe and gratitude!

 

This is my theory:  that knowledge is not solid, like a rock, nor even liquid, like water, but is the wind, still and wild, shocking, sweet, soothing, deadly.  And the one who loves knowledge is a leaf, eager, vulnerable, cast about and tethered to the ride … nothing in the grip of this ineffable omnipresent god.

 

And this is my dream:  that the university would be the home of leaves and wind, visions and terror and joy.  And that students and teachers would be fellow pilgrims, wandering where they would, far from money’s teeth.  That it would be a showcase of the laughing lightness of the mind, synaptic orgies flashing the marketplace.  And that the Ph.D., official zenith of learning, last stop on knowledge’s signed road, would indicate the nimblest minds, the ones that step and smile and leap across life’s spectral stage, and are not daunted by the world’s hard obstacles, but sing in rough weird unities the human spirit’s unsingable song.